DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1601
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NRO6358-13
16 December 2013
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 16 December 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
The Board also notes that you have applied for a correction to
your record for an error that allegedly occurred more than 60
years ago. Under the rules governing this Board, an application
for a correction of a naval record must be made within three
years after the discovery of the alleged error. Failure to file
within the prescribed three years may be excused only in cases
where the Board finds that it is in the interests of justice to
do so.
Although you neglected to assert your claim for an inordinately
long period of time without justification and you provided no
evidence as to why you did not seek to have the alleged error
corrected earlier, the Board still decided to review your case.
Marine Corps enlisted advancements are based on a competitive
system which considers a variety of performance factors
including a candidate’s overall performance, technical
knowledge, military proficiency, performance of duty, conduct,
education, physical fitness, time in service, time in grade,
experience, awards, decorations, and the like. In addition,
before any candidate may be advanced, the candidate must have
the favorable recommendation of their commanding officer.
Docket No.NR06358-13
Personnel within each military occupational specialty (MOS)
compete with each other for a limited number of promotion
vacancies. Only those qualified candidates for whom vacancies
exist are advanced.
Based on the circumstances described above, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
- will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter. not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5508 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4874 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2316-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2013. Before any candidate may be advanced, the candidate must have the favorable recommendation of their commanding officer. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5028-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2013. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4919-13
Board for. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5664-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your- application on 26 August 2013. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. those qualified candidates for whom vacancies exist are Docket No.NRO05664-13 advanced.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6939 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 November 2013. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. The absence of a service record showing’ the effective date of advancement indicates that a candidate was not actually advanced in the active duty component.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6070-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2013. It is possible, even common, for a candidate to receive 4 passing score on an advancement exam and/or to complete minimum required advancement courses, but still not be actually advanced. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1551 13
Navy enlisted advancements ar which considers a vari candidate’s overall performan proficiency, Pe fitness, time in service, decorations, and the like. Only those qualified candidates for whom vacancies exist are advanced. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05884 12
Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Before any candidate may be advanced, the candidate must have the favorable recommendation of their commanding officer. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.